I am conducting open experimental research. I am downloading parts of a booklet: HAIGHT ON PRECALL FOR BACCARAT.
PRECALL AS A BET SELECTOR
The term precall is from a work that describes memory as extending into both the past and the future.You recall the past and precall the future. The past is fixed but the future remains plastic. Precall does not extend very far into the future.
Statistical studies tend to indicate no particular ability in the majority of people, but often isolate a very few people that appear to have greater than probable results. Study of specific individuals is considered to devolve into anecdotal evidence.
John Logan (a good friend, deceased) told of watching a man correctly call every card as dealt from a shuffled deck; twice. I did not see this, but when John reported, it could be taken to the bank. Some people can see through cards.
The ability does exist. Absent a mutation, if one person has the ability, then most people should possess it although the ability might be latent.
The art of dowsing is an established fact, more or less available to aware people. Non urbanized people of desert climates are more successful at locating water than their urbanized counterparts. In the words of an ancient, “Some people have it, some don’t.”
Humans developed a high degree of analytical ability, a great ability when facing unknown circumstances. With intelligence comes the ability to question and to analyze.
It seems that analytic intelligence is a parallel survival ability and in most instances is superior to intuition. When analytic intelligence is compared to intuition, sometimes, it is inferior. It appears that development of analytic ability is destructive of psychic reception. It is questionable to the analytic mind that psychic ability exists or that if it exists, that it can be controlled.
It appears the operator must have belief the operation will succeed or it will not. If you don't believe that the ability exists for you, then it surely will not. Analytic intelligence tends to reject non explained data as superstition. Do we have an additional sense present? Maybe, maybe not.
To achieve certainty, we need to test for ourselves using ourselves as the guinea pig.
A live casino table game is an ideal testing platform.
We need a physical devise as a marker to which we can attach number, so we can test. We can’t take a forked peach stick or a pendulum to the betting table, even for research. Of all the markers possible, using twitching of fingers as a dowsing instrument may the best mechanical devise.
Finger twitching is the creation of a "yes/no" machine.
A twitch of the right index (or other finger, at your selection) finger might indicate “yes,” absence of the twitch might mean “no.” The question to be asked might be “will Player win this hand?” or “will Banker win this hand?” A finger from each hand may be used, one hand for one side of a paired chance. A twitch from the opposite hand would be for the opposite side.
Finger dowsing is an “out of casino” practice that may be developed for any form of “yes” or “no” decision.
Breathe: Inhale deeply, possibly with eyes partially or completely closed.
Closing ones eyes closes out much external stimuli and puts one in an Alpha state. Training to consciously enter Theta is beyond our pay grade.
Begin the exhale as a relaxation and aim simultaneously. Aim is the question, will Red win? If a bet on Red will win, the right finger will twitch. A failure of Red to win will produce a twitch of the left finger.
If an answer has been produced (or forced, more about this later), place the indicated bet and then wait for the results.
Wash and recycle. If you practice this (with a bit of care), you will be unobserved in the casino. I’ve never tried to develop the skill, but there is evidence against ridiculing the technique.
Five to ten days before a casino visit, start an auto programing technique. If you are relaxed and close your eyes, you automatically go in to a mental state where you have brain waves in the alpha category.
While relaxed in alpha (during the day, just prior to going to sleep, possibly in a dream state), state to yourself,
"I am the source of my future. I have access to all knowledge. When I ask a question that has a "yes" answer, my right index finger will twitch. If the answer is "no," my left index finger will twitch."
Spend one to five days with alpha programing to develop the yes/no machine. As an intermediate exercise, verbally ask yourself, is 4 + 2 equal to six? If your right index finger does not twitch, you cause it to twitch. A twitch can be minor, just so that you can feel it. Ask yourself is 4 + 2 equal to eight? If your left index finger does not twitch. These exercises may be done at anytime of the day as long as you are calm and relaxed.
Use the yes/no machine on a regular basis. Ask "Is this melon ripe?" "Is this product any better than the cheaper one?'' "Is that a cop car following me?" When you ask a question, if there is no finger twitch, twitch the finger that you think is appropriate. Continue until you constantly get finger twitches. This is a bit like conditioning exercises where when the bell rings, the dog salivates.
These exercises conform with what is called neurolinguistic programing, NLP for short. The exercises combined with the alpha programming is believed to set up neural circuits that connect you and your latent ability to the physical mechanism of the finger twitch.
How often to run the alpha programming is a puzzler. There different answers. Once may be enough if there is sufficient positive intent that the command be obeyed.
Twenty times may not be enough if you do not believe the technique will work. If you believe the technique will work for you and continuously install the mantra, your mind may interprets this as your being unconvinced it may not work. The human mind only needs one exhibit to learn. Practice may or may not make perfect.
Practicing with intermediate finger twitches may obviate the need of belief. Apparently, the practice of dowsing requires belief by the operator. Had ye the faith of a mustard seed...
I am informed of tests that show some preceptors unknowingly predict for their own failure. Their results are statistically less than a result obtained by chance.
If you choose to try to develop the technique, use a decent attack algorithm while testing. This should provide a break even or some winnings if the tested game is of at near equal unity (the chance expectation). Why Attack rather than defense? Your mind set is that you are attacking the universe rather than defending against it.
A yes/no machine is a tool. Humans are tool makers.